Harbin Songbei survey said the super fish is not illegal News – Sohu-diamondprox

Jun 4, 2018 // By:feichang // No Comment

Harbin Songbei survey said the "super fish" is not illegal – Sohu news video screenshot on the evening of 15, Harbin City, Songbei announced the investigation informed North wild fishing village "million iron stew" consumer dispute. Informed that, after investigation, the village lobby features a relevant ingredients price publicity, is the price tag, which belongs to the operators independently formulated price fish market regulated prices, is not within the scope of government guidance and government pricing. The 1 event after a dispute for 1.5 hours by the hotel and the transfer of video, consumers Chen line of about 20 people on February 9, 2016 at 19 PM, to the north shore of Songbei wild fishing village in the "northeast people" and "Hezhe people" two dining rooms. According to the hotel side, Chen orders in the lobby fish orders and orders after confirmation of the menu, did not raise objections. 21 pm at the checkout process, because of objections to the number of pounds dispute dauricus ingredients, and the hotel side, the two sides alarm scene by the police mediation settlement, Xu left the hotel at 22:30. Yesterday, the hotel official told reporters that the night there were conflicts between the two sides, but there is no beating, is the customer first hands, "he drank, thinking is not clear."." 2 price price category according to the guidance in which the hotel side reflects the consumer into the store Chen in the ordering process, the hotel lobby with related party food prices publicity, is the price tag, and consumer to inform its food price point Chen, Chen had no objection. On the media attention to the price of 398 yuan catty Huso dauricus if there are violations, in accordance with the "People’s Republic of China price law" the third chapter "on the prices of most goods and services market, a handful of prices of goods and services subject to government pricing or government pricing" and chapter eleventh on "operators pricing, enjoying autonomy to set the price of market regulation rights" provisions, the sales price is not within which the government guided prices and government pricing category, belongs to the developed market operators. Yesterday, the north shore of the wild fishing village official said, a rare winter fishing to fish, the purchase price in one hundred seventy eighty yuan. In addition, during the Spring Festival, the cost of labor and other factors rose, prices rose naturally. 3 pounds is currently the only hotel dauricus unilateral testimony due to contact with the consumer, the micro-blog investigation group has been unable to verify the contents of evidence, at this stage only involved Hotel unilateral testimony. According to the hotel side said, consumers Chen points to pick up the ingredients, with the ordering staff together to weigh the ingredients, after the consumer recognition, ordering staff through ordering treasure orders. After the transfer of documents, where consumers have single rooms at 19:32, the document shows the number of pounds for middle mark Huso dauricus 14.4 pounds. 4 after the actual consumption mediation, the hotel receives 7200 yuan, the consumer called "slaughtered more than 10000", and drying out 10302 yuan consumer bills. Hotel side said the consumption bill is the initial settlement bill after dinner, because of disputes, after the police scene mediation, the hotel side in the total amount of consumption (10302 yuan) on the basis of 30 percent off discount, the actual income of 7200

哈市松北区调查称“天价鱼”不违规-搜狐新闻 视频截图   15日晚,哈尔滨市松北区公布了北岸野生渔村“万元铁锅炖”消费争端问题的调查情况通报。通报称,经查,渔村大堂内设有相关食材价格公示,属明码标价,其中鳇鱼价格属于经营者自主制定的市场调节价,不在政府指导价和政府定价范畴之内。   1事件经过   纠纷持续一个半小时   经向饭店方了解和调取录像,消费者陈某一行约20人于2016年2月9日晚19时许,到松北区北岸野生渔村分别在“关东人家”和“赫哲人家”两间包房就餐。据饭店方反映,陈某在大堂鱼档点菜并对点菜单确认后下单,未提出异议。21时许在结账过程中,因对鳇鱼食材斤数提出异议,与饭店方产生纠纷,双方报警后经民警现场调解达成和解,于22点30分许离开饭店。   昨天,该饭店负责人告诉记者,当晚双方的确有过冲突,但没有打人,是顾客先动手,“他喝酒了,思路不清晰。”   2价格问题   鳇鱼售价不在指导范畴   据饭店方反映消费者陈某在进店点餐过程中,饭店方大堂内设有相关食材价格公示,属明码标价,并向消费者陈某告知其所点食材价格,陈某并无异议。关于媒体关注的鳇鱼价格398元 斤是否存在违规问题,按照《中华人民共和国价格法》第一章第三条关于“大多数商品和服务价格实行市场调节价,极少数商品和服务价格实行政府指导价或者政府定价”及第一章第十一条关于“经营者进行价格活动,享有自主制定属于市场调节的价格的权利”等规定,鳇鱼销售价格不在政府指导价和政府定价范畴之内,属于经营者自主制定的市场调节价。   昨天,北岸野生渔村负责人表示,鳇鱼较稀有,冬季难捕捞,进价在一百七八十元左右。加之春节期间,人工等成本上涨,价格自然上涨。   3鳇鱼斤数   目前仅有饭店单方证言   因无法与消费者取得联系,调查组至今无法对其微博内容进行核实取证,现阶段只有涉事饭店方单方证言。据饭店方称,消费者陈某点取食材后,与点菜员一同对食材进行称重,消费者认可后,点菜员通过点菜宝下单。经调取单据,消费者所在包房19点32分确有下单,单据上显示鳇鱼中段标注斤数为14.4斤。   4实际消费   调解后饭店实收7200元   消费者称“被宰一万多”,并晒出10302元消费票据。饭店方称该消费票据为就餐后初始的结算票据,后因发生纠纷,经民警现场调解,饭店方在总消费金额(10302元)基础上给予7折优惠,实收7200元,并提供相关最终结算清单。同时,饭店方也提供了客人现场现金付账的监控录像。   5民警执法   未见抽烟等不文明执法   经询问出警人员,民警赶到北岸野生渔村现场后,发现涉事双方都在酒店大厅等候。民警随即向双方了解情况,并对双方进行劝解劝说,进行法制宣传。在民警的调解下,双方都表达了自行协商和解的愿望。最后,陈某与饭店负责人拥抱和解,互留微信、电话等联系方式,并对民警过年期间快速出警帮助化解纠纷表示感谢。   经调查现场录像和询问民警,未见出警人员有抽烟等不文明执法行为,也未见民警到现场后,双方有肢体冲突行为。下一步,松北区将尽一切努力继续联系消费者,深入调查取证。也希望当事人主动与松北区取得联系,还原事件原貌。   相关   涉事饭店公布监控录像   针对江苏常州网友“jack光头”陈岩反映的消费争端问题,涉事饭店“北岸野生渔村”公布了当晚监控录像。   据饭店公布的视频显示,一名男子和一名女子在前台处拉扯,最终女子拿出钱包,先点出6沓百元钞票放在前台,随后又点出几张百元钞票,一并交给饭店工作人员。另一段视频显示,一个穿黑色羽绒服的人拽住一女子衣领,周围还有许多人,场面十分混乱。   据了解,视频中的女子先点出的6沓钞票每沓为1000元,最后点出的几张为1200元,加起来刚好是7200元。随后视频里的“黑色羽绒服”是顾客,被拽住衣领的女子是饭店服务员。   当事人非常州地税职工   此外,网上有传言称,当事人系常州地税局职工。昨天中午12点34分,常州地税局官方微博称,经查询人事部门干部花名册和聘用制员工名单,未发现叫“陈岩”的干部职工,也未发现谐音的相关人员。对照手机号查找,未发现持有此号码的干部职工。   京华时报记者迟名相关的主题文章:

About feichang

Browse Archived Articles by feichang

Related

Sorry. There are no related articles at this time.